Sign in
Get a Demo
Talk with an accountant.
Understand the principal vs agency difference, how it impacts revenue reporting, and get clear steps to determine your company’s role in every transaction.
When you buy from an online marketplace, who is the actual seller? Is it the marketplace itself, or the vendor using the platform? This simple question gets to the heart of the principal vs agency dilemma. Understanding the difference between a principal and agent is one of the most critical accounting decisions you'll make. Are you the company principal responsible for business transactions, or are you simply facilitating the sale? The answer determines whether you report gross revenue or just your commission—a choice that fundamentally shapes your financial statements.
Getting your revenue reporting right often comes down to understanding one key relationship: the one between a principal and an agent. It might sound like legal jargon, but figuring out which role your business plays in any given transaction is fundamental to accurate accounting. When you sell a product or service, are you the primary provider, or are you facilitating a sale for someone else? The answer determines whether you report the full amount of the sale (gross revenue) or just your commission (net revenue).
This distinction is more than just a line item on your income statement; it’s a core component of financial compliance, especially under standards like ASC 606. Misclassifying your role can lead to inaccurate financial statements, compliance issues, and a skewed understanding of your company's performance. Let's break down these roles so you can confidently identify who's who in your business dealings and ensure your books are always audit-ready.
Think of the principal as the one calling the shots. In any business transaction, the principal is the company or person who has the primary responsibility for fulfilling the promise to the customer. They control the product or service before it's transferred and bear the ultimate risk. For example, if you design, create, and sell your own line of handmade soaps, you are the principal. You set the price, you're responsible for the inventory, and if a customer has an issue, you're the one they turn to for a solution. The principal holds the main legal power and is ultimately on the hook for delivering what was sold.
An agent is a person or company authorized to act on behalf of the principal. They don’t own the goods or services being sold; instead, their job is to facilitate the sale. The agent makes decisions or takes actions for the principal, but they don't carry the primary risk. A classic example is a real estate agent. They don’t own the houses they sell, but they connect buyers with sellers and earn a commission for their service. In the world of ecommerce, a marketplace that allows other vendors to sell products on its platform often acts as an agent. Their primary role is to bring the principal and the customer together.
The relationship between a principal and an agent is built on a formal or informal agreement. This is where the principal gives the agent the authority to act for them. Once that authority is granted, any agreement the agent makes within those defined boundaries is legally binding on the principal. This is why the terms of the agreement are so important. The agent has a legal duty, known as a fiduciary responsibility, to always act in the principal's best interests. This foundation of agency law ensures that the agent is working to benefit the principal, not just themselves, creating a relationship based on trust and accountability.
Figuring out whether you’re a principal or an agent can feel like a puzzle, but it gets a lot clearer when you know which questions to ask. The distinction isn't just about job titles; it’s about the fundamental nature of your business relationships and has a major impact on how you report revenue. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) provides specific guidance on this, and getting it right is key to staying compliant.
To determine your role, you need to look at who truly has control over the goods or services being sold. It comes down to a few key indicators: who directs the use of the product, who bears the financial risk, and who is ultimately responsible to the customer. Think of it as a checklist. By walking through these questions, you can confidently define your role in any transaction and ensure your financial statements accurately reflect your business operations. This clarity is essential for accurate reporting and making sound strategic decisions.
The biggest clue is control. A principal has control over the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer. This means they are the primary decision-maker. They can direct how the product is used, and they get the substantial benefits from it. For example, the principal sets the price, determines the product specifications, and is ultimately responsible for fulfilling the promise to the customer.
An agent, on the other hand, doesn’t have this level of control. Their job is to arrange for another company—the principal—to provide the goods or services. They act as an intermediary, facilitating the sale without ever truly owning or controlling the product. They might influence the transaction, but the final authority rests with the principal.
Risk is a powerful indicator. Ask yourself: who is on the hook if things go wrong? A principal typically bears the significant risks associated with the transaction. This includes inventory risk—the danger that the goods won't sell—and credit risk, which is the risk that the customer won't pay. If the product is returned, it’s usually the principal who has to manage the return and potential loss.
An agent’s exposure is much more limited. Since they don't own the inventory, they don't lose money if it becomes obsolete or gets damaged. Their primary risk is not earning their commission or fee if the sale falls through. This separation of risk is a core part of the principal versus agent framework and a clear sign of who holds the power in the relationship.
How you record revenue is a direct result of your role. A principal recognizes the gross amount of the sale as revenue. If a customer pays $100 for a product, the principal reports the full $100 on their income statement. They also record the cost of that product as a separate expense (cost of goods sold). This is because they are responsible for the entire transaction with the end customer.
An agent’s accounting is different. They only recognize the net amount they get to keep—their fee or commission—as revenue. In that same $100 sale, if the agent’s commission is $15, they would only report $15 as revenue. This distinction is a cornerstone of ASC 606 compliance and has a massive impact on your company’s reported top-line growth.
Beyond the financial aspects, there’s a legal distinction that defines the relationship. An agent has what’s called a fiduciary duty to the principal. This is a formal obligation to act in the principal's best interest at all times. They must be loyal, avoid conflicts of interest, and cannot use their position to benefit themselves at the principal's expense. This legal responsibility is a defining feature of an agency relationship.
A principal does not have this same duty to an agent. The relationship is more straightforwardly commercial. While both parties are expected to act in good faith according to their contract, the principal’s primary obligation is to compensate the agent as agreed. This legal structure reinforces the agent's role as a representative acting on behalf of another.
Understanding the principal-agent dynamic in theory is one thing, but applying it to your business is where it really counts. A well-structured relationship is built on clear communication, defined roles, and mutual understanding. When these elements are in place, both parties can work together effectively, which is essential for accurate financial reporting and overall business health. Let's walk through how to build and maintain a strong principal-agent relationship from the ground up, covering everything from the initial agreement to handling the inevitable bumps in the road. This practical approach will help you prevent misunderstandings and keep your operations running smoothly.
The principal-agent relationship isn't just an abstract concept; it shows up in many different parts of business and professional life. Recognizing these scenarios can help you better understand your own role and responsibilities, whether you're running a company, managing a team, or hiring a professional. From the structure of a corporation to everyday employment, this dynamic is everywhere. Let's look at a few common examples to see how this framework applies in the real world and how it shapes legal and financial obligations for everyone involved.
One of the most common examples of a principal-agent relationship is between an employer and an employee. When you hire someone, you (the principal) are giving them the authority to act on your company's behalf. This relationship is founded on an agreement—whether it's a formal contract or an informal understanding—that the employee will perform certain duties in the best interest of the business. Every action an employee takes within the scope of their job, from making a sale to signing a purchase order, legally binds the employer. This is the core of agency law in the workplace.
In a corporate structure, the board of directors acts as the principal, representing the interests of the shareholders. The CEO, in turn, is the agent, hired by the board to manage the company's day-to-day operations. The board sets the overall strategy and vision, and the CEO is responsible for executing that vision. This relationship is a high-stakes version of the principal-agent dynamic, where the CEO has a fiduciary duty to make decisions that align with the goals set by the board and ultimately benefit the shareholders who own the company.
When you hire a lawyer, you are the principal, and the lawyer is your agent. You are employing them to represent you and act on your behalf in legal matters. The lawyer has a strict fiduciary duty to act in your best interest, providing advice and taking actions that are meant to achieve your desired outcome. This is a powerful example of the trust required in a principal-agent relationship, as the agent is given significant authority to make decisions that can have a major impact on the principal's life or business.
In the retail world, the line between principal and agent can determine how millions of dollars in revenue are reported. A manufacturer (the principal) creates a product and often bears the inventory risk. They might then use a retailer to sell that product to consumers. If the retailer simply facilitates the sale for a commission without ever owning the inventory, they are an agent. This distinction is critical for revenue recognition, as the agent would only report their commission as revenue, not the full price of the product sold.
The principal-agent concept is also fundamental to the world of financial trading. When you place an order to buy or sell a stock, your brokerage firm can fill that order in one of two ways: by acting as a principal or as an agent. The method they use affects how your trade is executed, the price you get, and the fees you might pay. Understanding this distinction gives you a clearer picture of what's happening behind the scenes when you invest and helps you see how your broker operates in the market.
In principal trading, the brokerage firm acts as a dealer. This means they sell you securities from their own inventory or buy securities from you for their own account. Think of it like a car dealership selling you a car from its lot. The firm is the principal in the transaction, and they make money on the "spread"—the difference between the price they paid for the security and the price they sell it for. This approach can lead to faster trade execution because the broker doesn't need to find another buyer or seller.
When a firm engages in agency trading, it acts as a traditional broker, or agent. Instead of using its own inventory, the firm goes into the open market to find a buyer for the securities you want to sell, or a seller for the securities you want to buy. In this model, the brokerage is a matchmaker, connecting two separate parties to complete a transaction. For this service, the firm charges a commission. The key here is that the broker is acting on your behalf, not as the other party in the trade.
The distinction between principal and agency trading also affects the back-end process of settling the trade. For agency trades, the clearing process—where the security officially changes hands and the money is exchanged—typically takes two business days to complete. During this time, your rights as an investor are protected, as the brokerage is simply facilitating the transaction according to market rules. In principal trades, the process can be more immediate, but it's important to know that you are trading directly with your broker, which can sometimes create a conflict of interest.
The foundation of any solid principal-agent relationship is a clear, written agreement. This document is your roadmap, outlining exactly how you’ll work together. The agreement should explicitly name the principal—the person or company with the legal authority—and the agent, who is given the power to act on the principal's behalf. Think of it as setting the ground rules before the game begins. Your contract should detail the scope of the agent's authority, the duration of the relationship, and the terms of compensation. Getting everything in writing from the start prevents confusion down the line and ensures everyone is on the same page about their roles and expectations.
Once the agreement is in place, it's crucial to define each party's duties. A principal has a responsibility to honor contracts the agent makes, provide fair compensation, and support the agent if issues arise while they're following instructions. On the other side, an agent must always act in the principal's best interest. This legal concept, known as a fiduciary duty, means the agent can't use their position for personal gain or to harm the principal. They are also expected to perform their tasks with reasonable skill and care. Clearly outlining these responsibilities helps build trust and provides a framework for accountability, which is vital for a healthy partnership.
Deciding whether your company is acting as a principal or an agent has a major impact on your financial statements. This classification determines who you recognize as your customer and how much revenue you record from a sale. Because the stakes are so high, you need a reliable way to track performance. This involves setting clear key performance indicators (KPIs) and establishing a regular reporting schedule. With the right systems, you can monitor sales, inventory, and customer interactions to ensure the agent is meeting expectations and that your revenue recognition is accurate. Consistent tracking gives you the data needed to make informed decisions and verify that the relationship is working as intended.
The most common issue in a principal-agent relationship is a misalignment of interests, often called the "principal-agent problem." This happens when an agent is motivated to act in their own best interest rather than the principal's. For example, a sales agent might accept a lower price on a deal to close it quickly and earn a commission, even if holding out for a better offer would have been more profitable for the principal. The root of this issue is often an information imbalance or a poorly designed incentive structure. Recognizing this potential for conflict is the first step toward fixing it, which usually involves creating a system where the agent’s success is directly tied to the principal’s goals.
To prevent conflicts and keep everyone aligned, focus on three key strategies. First, design better incentives. If an agent's compensation is directly linked to the principal's success—like profit sharing instead of a flat commission—their interests will naturally align. Second, establish clear oversight. This doesn't mean micromanaging, but it does mean having systems in place to monitor performance and ensure the agent is acting appropriately. Finally, be specific about the agent's authority. By granting only the minimum power necessary for them to do their job, you limit the potential for them to act outside the principal's best interests. These proactive steps can resolve most disagreements before they even start.
Deciding whether you’re a principal or an agent isn’t just an internal label—it fundamentally changes how you report revenue. This distinction directly affects your top-line numbers, profitability, and overall financial story. Getting it right is essential for accurate reporting, stakeholder trust, and staying compliant. It’s one of the most critical accounting decisions you’ll make, as it determines the very foundation of your income statement and influences how investors, lenders, and even your own team perceive your company’s performance.
If you are the principal, you report the gross amount paid by the customer as revenue. Think of it this way: you’re in the driver’s seat for that transaction. For example, if a customer buys a product from you for $500, you record the full $500 as revenue. The cost of providing that product is then recorded separately as the cost of goods sold (COGS). This method reflects that you control the good or service before it reaches the customer, making the full value of the sale yours to report.
When you act as an agent, you only report the net amount you keep as your fee or commission. You are essentially a matchmaker, connecting a buyer with another company’s product or service. Using the same example, if you facilitate that $500 sale for a 10% commission, you only record $50 in revenue. The remaining $450 isn't yours—it passes through you to the principal. This "net" revenue reporting shows that your role was to arrange the sale, not to fulfill the primary promise to the customer.
This single decision creates a ripple effect across your financial statements. Reporting gross revenue as a principal makes your company appear larger in terms of sales volume, while net reporting as an agent results in a smaller top line but can show higher profit margins. This choice impacts key metrics that investors and internal teams use to judge performance. It defines who your customer is and what your obligations are, shaping the perception of your company’s scale and financial health, especially when dealing with data from multiple business systems.
Under ASC 606, you must determine your role for each distinct good or service you provide before you can recognize revenue. This isn't a one-time, company-wide decision; you could be a principal for one revenue stream and an agent for another. For high-volume businesses, making these distinctions manually is prone to error and incredibly time-consuming. Implementing an automated revenue recognition system ensures you can accurately classify every transaction, maintain compliance, and produce financial reports you can trust, especially during an audit.
A strong principal-agent relationship is built on more than just a solid contract—it thrives on trust, transparency, and clear communication. When both parties are on the same page, you minimize friction and create a partnership that truly works. The goal is to move from a simple transaction to a collaborative effort where everyone is working toward the same objectives. This proactive approach not only prevents misunderstandings but also lays the groundwork for long-term success and accurate financial reporting. Here are a few practical ways to cultivate a healthy and productive relationship.
The principal-agent problem often starts with an information gap. You (the principal) have the big-picture view, while your agent is focused on their specific tasks. This disconnect can lead to actions that aren't perfectly aligned with your company's best interests, even with the best intentions. The key is to share relevant data and insights freely. When agents understand the why behind their work and see how their performance impacts the bottom line, they're better equipped to make decisions that support your goals. Creating a transparent environment helps bridge this gap and builds a foundation of mutual trust.
From day one, your expectations should be crystal clear. This goes beyond the legal clauses in your agreement. You need to clearly communicate your brand standards, performance metrics, and operational workflows. According to Cornell Law, a principal has a duty to treat the agent fairly, and that begins with setting them up for success. Don't assume your agent knows what you want. Schedule regular check-ins to discuss progress, answer questions, and provide feedback. This ongoing dialogue ensures that everyone remains aligned and that small issues are addressed before they become significant problems.
How you structure compensation can either align or misalign your agent’s motivations with your own. If an agent’s incentives don’t match your business objectives, you can’t be surprised when their priorities differ from yours. Think beyond a flat fee and consider performance-based rewards. Tying compensation to specific outcomes—like customer satisfaction scores, sales volume, or project milestones—gives your agent a direct stake in achieving the results you care about. This approach turns their personal success into a direct reflection of your company's success, creating a powerful win-win scenario.
Oversight isn't about micromanaging; it's about having the right systems in place to monitor performance and ensure everything is on track. This protects both you and your agent. By implementing clear reporting processes and using technology to track key metrics, you can maintain visibility without getting in the way of their work. Having a centralized platform where you can see real-time data helps you spot trends, measure effectiveness, and make informed decisions. These systems provide the clarity needed to confirm your agents are performing their duties and acting in your best interest, which you can learn more about in our HubiFi Blog.
Getting your principal versus agent determination right is the foundation of accurate financial reporting. It’s not just about following the rules; it’s about presenting a true picture of your company’s performance. This decision impacts your revenue figures, your financial statements, and how investors and auditors view your business. With the right approach and systems, you can handle this complexity with confidence and keep your reporting clean and compliant.
The principal vs. agent decision directly determines whether you report revenue on a gross or net basis. If you’re the principal, you report the gross amount collected from the customer as revenue. This is because you control the good or service before it's transferred. Think of it as the full sales price. If you’re the agent, you only report the net amount you keep as your fee or commission. You’re recognizing revenue for your service of arranging the transaction, not for the good or service itself. Making the right choice here is critical for accurately reflecting your company’s top-line performance on your income statement.
You can’t just decide you’re a principal or an agent and call it a day. You need to document your assessment for each distinct good or service you provide. This means creating a clear record of your analysis, outlining why you concluded you have (or don’t have) control before the transfer to the customer. This documentation should detail the specific facts and circumstances you considered, like inventory risk, pricing authority, and performance obligations. When auditors come knocking, this is the evidence they’ll want to see to support your revenue recognition policy. Strong documentation shows you’ve done your due diligence.
Your principal vs. agent decision has a ripple effect across your financial reporting. It changes fundamental data points, like who you identify as your customer and the transaction price you record for a sale. If your systems are disconnected, it’s easy for errors to creep in. Manually tracking these nuances across spreadsheets is a recipe for disaster, especially for high-volume businesses. Having a system with robust integrations ensures that once you make the determination, your accounting, CRM, and ERP systems all reflect it consistently. This automation is key to maintaining data integrity and producing reliable financial statements.
Auditors will absolutely scrutinize your principal vs. agent assessments. The best way to prepare is to be proactive. Make the determination before you start applying the other steps of the revenue recognition model. Your team should thoroughly review all the facts and use sound judgment to decide which indicators are most persuasive for your specific situation. Have your documentation organized and ready to share. If you’re unsure about your position, it’s always better to seek expert advice ahead of time. You can schedule a consultation to ensure your reporting is audit-proof and built on a solid foundation.
Making the right call between principal and agent is more than just an accounting exercise—it's a critical part of your risk management and compliance strategy. Getting it wrong can lead to restated financials, audit issues, and a loss of investor confidence. The key is to create a system that ensures you make the right judgment call every single time, no matter how complex the transaction. Let's walk through how to build a framework that protects your business and keeps your reporting accurate.
First things first: you need solid internal controls. Deciding if you're a principal or an agent isn't a strategic choice; it's a judgment based on the specific facts of each transaction. This decision has a ripple effect, influencing everything from who you identify as your customer to how much revenue you recognize. Strong internal controls create a clear, consistent process for your team to follow. This means documenting your assessment criteria, training your team on ASC 606 guidelines, and establishing a review process to ensure the rules are applied correctly every time. This isn't about adding bureaucracy—it's about creating a safety net that ensures accuracy and consistency in your financial reporting.
For businesses dealing with a high volume of transactions, manually assessing each one is not just inefficient—it's a recipe for error. You have to determine if you're a principal or an agent for every single good or service you provide. This is where technology becomes your best friend. An automated revenue recognition system can apply your documented rules consistently across thousands of transactions in real-time. It removes the guesswork and human error from the equation, ensuring that each sale is categorized correctly according to ASC 606. By automating this critical judgment, you can close your books faster and with greater confidence, knowing your revenue is reported accurately.
The entire principal vs. agent decision hinges on one key concept: control. According to accounting standards, you're the principal if you control the good or service before it gets to the customer. But how do you prove control? With data. You need clean, accessible data on inventory, fulfillment, and customer terms to back up your position. This means centralizing your data from different systems—like your ERP, CRM, and payment processor—into a single source of truth. When your data is organized and reliable, you have the evidence you need to justify your reporting decisions. Having seamless integrations with HubiFi is essential for creating this unified view.
Accounting standards aren't set in stone. Regulations evolve, and interpretations can be refined over time. Staying compliant means staying informed. Your finance team should have access to ongoing training and resources to keep up with any changes to revenue recognition rules. This could involve subscribing to updates from accounting standard-setters or following reputable financial publications. A great way to stay current is by regularly reading expert analysis on topics that matter to your business. Keeping an eye on insightful articles, like those on the HubiFi blog, can help you understand how regulatory shifts might impact your operations and ensure your compliance framework is always up to date.
Can my business be both a principal and an agent at the same time? Absolutely. It’s very common for a business to act as a principal for some transactions and an agent for others. For example, you might be the principal for the core product you develop and sell directly, but act as an agent when you offer a third-party service alongside it. The key is that you must assess your role for each distinct good or service you provide to a customer, as your responsibilities can change from one revenue stream to the next.
What's the most important factor in determining my role: the contract, the risk, or something else? While things like who carries inventory risk and what your contract says are important clues, the single most critical factor under ASC 606 is control. You need to determine who controls the good or service before it is transferred to the end customer. Think of control as being in the driver's seat—the one who can direct the use of the product and gets the majority of its benefits is the principal. The other factors simply help you figure out who truly has that control.
Is it better for my company to be a principal or an agent? One role isn't inherently better than the other; it's all about accurately reflecting your business model. Acting as a principal will result in higher top-line revenue, which can make your company look larger. Acting as an agent leads to lower reported revenue but can often show stronger profit margins. The goal isn't to choose the role that looks better on paper, but to correctly classify your transactions to ensure your financial statements are accurate and compliant.
If we get the principal vs. agent decision wrong, how difficult is it to fix? Correcting a misclassification can be a significant undertaking. It often requires restating your financial statements, which can damage credibility with investors and lenders. The process involves going back to re-evaluate past transactions, recalculate revenue, and amend your financial reports. This is why it's so important to establish clear internal controls and use reliable systems from the start to prevent these errors before they happen.
Our contract with a partner is a bit vague. How do we decide who is the principal? When a contract is unclear, you have to look at the substance of the transaction. Don't just focus on the legal wording; look at what actually happens in practice. Ask yourself practical questions: Who is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to the customer? Who sets the price? Who bears the loss if the inventory doesn't sell? The answers to these questions will point to which party truly has control, regardless of what the contract says.
Former Root, EVP of Finance/Data at multiple FinTech startups
Jason Kyle Berwanger: An accomplished two-time entrepreneur, polyglot in finance, data & tech with 15 years of expertise. Builder, practitioner, leader—pioneering multiple ERP implementations and data solutions. Catalyst behind a 6% gross margin improvement with a sub-90-day IPO at Root insurance, powered by his vision & platform. Having held virtually every role from accountant to finance systems to finance exec, he brings a rare and noteworthy perspective in rethinking the finance tooling landscape.
Meet with an expert in revenue recognition and order-to-cash accounting and automate revenue close.
Talk with an accountant →*Or watch 2 minute demo here.
Power your high-volume business's revenue compliance and reporting needs with one platform.
