Sign in
Get a Demo
Talk with an accountant.
Get clear answers to "how do I audit my revenue numbers accurately?" with practical steps for proving occurrence of revenue and passing your next audit.
When an auditor walks in, their first question isn't about complex formulas. It's simple: "Can you prove this sale is real?" This is the heart of the occurrence of revenue—the assertion that every transaction you've recorded actually happened. If you can't prove it, your entire financial picture is called into question. So, if you're wondering, "how do I audit my revenue numbers accurately?", the answer starts right here. We'll cover the key controls and best practices for mastering the occurrence assertion, helping you build a rock-solid financial foundation that makes any audit feel like a routine check-up.
When it comes to your company’s financials, every number tells a story. The revenue occurrence assertion is what makes sure that story is true. It’s a fundamental principle in accounting that verifies whether the transactions you’ve recorded on your books actually happened. Think of it as the first line of defense against errors and a cornerstone of a trustworthy financial audit. Before an auditor can verify anything else, they need to confirm that the sales you claim to have made are legitimate.
At its heart, the occurrence assertion asks a simple question: Did this sale really happen? It confirms that a recorded transaction, like a sale, represents a real event that relates to your business. For example, it ensures that a sale on your income statement corresponds to an actual order from a valid customer, for which goods were shipped or services were delivered. This assertion is all about validating the events that generate revenue. It’s the difference between a number in a spreadsheet and a genuine exchange of value with a customer, providing a crucial reality check for your financial statements.
Accurate financial reporting is built on a foundation of trust, and the occurrence assertion is a key pillar of that foundation. Revenue is one of the most scrutinized areas in any financial audit. For companies with modern, hybrid revenue models—mixing subscriptions, one-time sales, and bundled services—proving occurrence can get complicated fast. Fragmented data from different systems can create significant audit risk. Auditors need to be certain that every sale recorded actually took place before they can sign off on your financials, which is essential for maintaining compliance with standards like ASC 606.
To prepare for an audit, you need to think like an auditor. This means understanding their mindset, their priorities, and the professional standards that guide their work. Auditors aren't just checking boxes; they are trained to look at your financials with a critical eye, especially when it comes to revenue. They approach their task with a specific framework that focuses on risk, skepticism, and materiality. Knowing how they view your numbers is the first step toward building a financial reporting process that can stand up to any level of scrutiny and ensure a smooth, efficient audit every time.
Auditors don’t begin their work assuming everything is perfect. Instead, they operate with a healthy dose of professional skepticism. This isn't about distrust; it's a core principle of their profession. When it comes to revenue, they start with the assumption of directional risk—the idea that errors are more likely to overstate revenue than understate it. Their default position is that your revenue might be inflated until they find compelling evidence to the contrary. This is why proving occurrence is so critical. Your job is to provide a clear, undeniable audit trail that validates every transaction, effectively overcoming this initial skepticism with hard facts and solid documentation.
Revenue is the lifeblood of your business and the number that investors, lenders, and stakeholders watch most closely. Because it’s such a key indicator of performance, it’s automatically classified as a high-risk area in an audit. The pressure to meet targets can create incentives for errors or even intentional misstatements. This risk is magnified for businesses with complex revenue streams, like those mixing subscriptions and one-time sales, where applying accounting rules correctly is more challenging. An auditor’s primary goal is to provide assurance that this critical number is reliable. They will dedicate significant time to testing your revenue transactions to ensure they are legitimate, accurately recorded, and compliant with accounting standards.
Auditors don't search for every single penny out of place. They focus on what’s "material." In simple terms, a misstatement is material if it’s significant enough to influence the decisions of someone reading your financial statements. This threshold isn't just a fixed dollar amount; it's also about context. A small error could be material if it helps your company hit a quarterly earnings target or points to a systemic weakness in your internal controls. When auditing revenue occurrence, auditors design their tests to detect any material misstatements. They need to be confident that your reported revenue isn't inflated by a significant amount of invalid transactions, ensuring the overall financial picture is trustworthy.
Getting revenue occurrence right is more than just an accounting chore—it’s the bedrock of your company’s financial integrity. Because revenue is typically the largest and most scrutinized line item on your financial statements, its accuracy has a ripple effect across the entire business. For investors, lenders, and even your own leadership team, verified revenue is a clear sign of a healthy, well-run company. It’s the proof that your sales are real, your growth is legitimate, and your financial reporting is trustworthy.
Failing to properly validate revenue occurrence doesn't just create a messy audit; it can undermine stakeholder confidence, lead to serious compliance issues, and put the company at significant financial and reputational risk. Think of it as the foundation of a house. If it’s not solid, everything built on top of it is unstable. Proving that your recorded revenue actually happened is essential for building a sustainable and credible business. It’s about demonstrating control over your financial operations and ensuring that the story your numbers tell is the truth.
Your stakeholders—from investors to board members—rely on your financial statements to make critical decisions. Since revenue is the biggest piece of the financial puzzle, any errors or misrepresentations can seriously mislead them. A clean audit, with proven revenue occurrence, acts as a seal of approval. It shows that your numbers are real and your business is trustworthy. This confidence is crucial for securing funding, attracting partners, and maintaining support for future growth. When stakeholders can trust your financial reporting, they are far more likely to invest in your vision and stand by you through market changes.
The revenue recognition standard, ASC 606, has put this area under an intense spotlight during financial audits. For companies with modern, hybrid revenue models that mix subscriptions, licenses, and bundled services, the risk is even higher. When your sales data is scattered across different systems like your CRM, billing platform, and ERP, it becomes incredibly difficult to prove that revenue was recognized correctly. This fragmentation creates significant audit risk. Using an automated revenue recognition solution helps you connect disparate data sources, ensuring you can meet these complex standards and provide auditors with a clear, compliant trail for every transaction.
At the heart of the ASC 606 standard is a simple but powerful idea: revenue should be recognized when you transfer control of a good or service to your customer. This marks a shift from older guidelines, which often focused on when risks and rewards were transferred. The new core principle is all about the customer’s ability to direct the use of and obtain substantially all the remaining benefits from the asset. In simpler terms, you record the revenue when your customer is officially in the driver's seat. This approach creates a more consistent and transparent picture of your company’s performance, making your financial reports much clearer for everyone involved.
To apply the principle of control, ASC 606 provides a clear, five-step framework. This model is the roadmap every business must follow to ensure compliance and accurate reporting. It breaks down the process into manageable stages, guiding you from the initial customer agreement to the final revenue entry on your books. Following this structured approach helps standardize how you handle different types of sales, which is especially important for businesses with complex or hybrid revenue streams. The five steps are:
The consequences of getting revenue occurrence wrong go far beyond a difficult audit. History is filled with cautionary tales of companies that faced serious fallout from revenue misstatements. The costs can be staggering, including hefty regulatory fines, the need to restate financials publicly, and a sharp drop in shareholder confidence. The damage to your company's reputation can be even more lasting and difficult to repair. Investing in strong internal controls and accurate reporting isn't just about passing an audit; it's about protecting your business from preventable disasters. You can find more insights on financial integrity and best practices on our blog.
When an auditor examines your revenue, they aren't just taking a quick glance at the total. They're working from a specific framework of "assertions," which are basically claims your company makes about its financial data. Think of it this way: by recording a sale, you're asserting that it really happened, that you recorded all the sales you made, and that the amounts are correct. The auditor's job is to test these claims.
Understanding these key assertions helps you prepare for an audit and maintain clean, reliable financial records year-round. For revenue occurrence, auditors primarily focus on three core areas to verify that your reported income is legitimate and accurate. Getting these right is fundamental to a smooth audit process and building trust in your financial statements. Let's break down what they're looking for.
This is the most straightforward assertion. The existence assertion is all about confirming that the revenue you've recorded on your books is tied to actual sales that took place. An auditor needs to see proof that you aren't just inventing transactions to make your numbers look better. They’re essentially asking, "Can you show me that this sale is real?"
To test this, they'll trace entries in your sales ledger back to source documents like customer purchase orders, signed contracts, and shipping receipts. The goal is to find a clear, unbroken trail of evidence that a legitimate transaction occurred with a real customer. This is a critical step in preventing the overstatement of revenue and is a foundational part of any financial statement audit.
While existence checks for fake sales, completeness does the opposite: it ensures no real sales were left out. The completeness assertion verifies that all revenue-generating transactions that occurred during a period have actually been recorded in your financial statements. It might seem strange to worry about understated revenue, but omitting sales can paint an inaccurate picture of your company's performance and could be a way to manipulate earnings or tax obligations.
To check for completeness, an auditor might take a sample of shipping documents or service delivery confirmations and trace them forward to make sure they were all included in the sales journal and general ledger. This process helps confirm that your financial reporting captures the full scope of your business activities and that nothing has slipped through the cracks.
Finally, even if a sale is real and recorded, it has to be recorded for the right amount. The accuracy and valuation assertion focuses on whether the amounts and other details of your sales transactions are correct. This means checking that the prices, quantities, discounts, and final totals on your invoices match the underlying agreements and were calculated properly.
An auditor might recalculate invoices, compare prices to your official price list, and verify that foreign currency transactions were converted using the correct exchange rate. This assertion is especially important for businesses with complex contracts or variable pricing, as it ensures revenue is recognized in line with accounting standards like ASC 606. Accurate data is the bedrock of sound financial decisions.
When an auditor sets out to test for revenue occurrence, they aren't just taking a quick glance at your sales numbers. They use a specific set of procedures to gather concrete evidence that every transaction recorded actually happened. Think of it as a methodical investigation where they follow the trail from your financial statements back to the original event. Their goal is to gain reasonable assurance that the revenue you're reporting is not overstated with phantom sales.
To do this, they employ a multi-pronged approach. They don't rely on a single test but instead use a combination of techniques to build a strong case. These methods include digging into your documentation, talking directly to your customers, analyzing trends in your data, and scrutinizing the timing of your sales. Each test provides a different piece of the puzzle, and together, they create a comprehensive picture of your revenue streams. Having organized, accessible data is key to making this process smooth and efficient. You can find more insights on our blog about keeping your financial operations audit-ready.
This is the classic "show me the proof" step. Auditors will select a sample of sales transactions directly from your sales ledger and ask to see the underlying documentation that supports them. This process is called vouching. They are looking for a clear, unbroken paper trail that connects the number in your books to a real-world transaction.
Key documents they’ll want to review include customer sales orders, shipping documents (like a bill of lading), and the final sales invoice. By matching the details across these documents—like customer name, date, items, and amounts—they can confirm that a legitimate sale took place and goods or services were actually delivered.
To get an even stronger form of evidence, auditors often go straight to the source: your customers. This provides external validation that is independent of your company's internal records. They may send out confirmation requests, which are letters or emails asking a sample of your customers to verify the details of transactions they had with your company during the period.
Auditors will ask them to confirm the amount of the sale and the date it occurred. In addition to direct confirmations, auditors will also examine your bank statements to trace payments from customers, confirming that cash was actually received for the recorded sales. This helps prove the transaction wasn't just recorded, but completed.
Auditors also take a high-level view to spot anything that looks unusual. Analytical procedures involve comparing your company's revenue data against other financial and non-financial information to identify unexpected fluctuations or trends. For example, they might compare your monthly revenue this year to the same months last year or check your gross margin percentage against industry averages.
A sudden, significant spike in sales in the last month of the year without a clear business reason could be a red flag that prompts a deeper investigation. Having all your financial data in one place through seamless integrations makes it easier to perform these analytics and explain any variances.
Timing is critical in revenue recognition. Cut-off testing is designed to ensure that transactions are recorded in the correct accounting period. An auditor will closely examine sales made just before and just after the fiscal year-end. They want to make sure that revenue from the new year hasn't been improperly pulled into the current year to inflate results.
To do this, they’ll inspect shipping documents and invoices for transactions recorded in the last week of the period and the first week of the next. They match the shipping dates to the invoice dates to confirm the revenue was recognized when the performance obligation was satisfied, which is a core principle of ASC 606.
Before an auditor even looks at a single sales invoice, they start by evaluating your internal controls. Think of this as checking the foundation of a house before inspecting the rooms. They want to understand the systems and processes you have in place to prevent and detect errors in your revenue cycle. Auditors first identify potential risks, like whether all revenue is being recorded accurately or if there's a risk of fraud. If your controls are strong, well-documented, and consistently applied, it gives them confidence in your data. This often means they can rely more on your system and may perform less detailed, substantive testing later on, saving you time and hassle during the audit.
To truly understand your revenue cycle, auditors perform a "walkthrough." This means they select one or two transactions and follow them from the very beginning to the very end. They’ll trace a customer order through to the invoice, its entry in the sales journal, and finally, the cash collection. During this process, they’ll ask questions to understand who does what and how the systems work together. For example, they’ll want to know if your detailed customer lists match your main accounting records. This end-to-end view helps them see the process in action and identify any gaps or weaknesses where a misstatement could occur.
One of the most powerful ways an auditor can verify a sale is by confirming you actually got paid for it. They do this by examining "subsequent collections," which means they look at cash received *after* the end of the fiscal year. If they can trace a payment received in January back to an invoice from December, it provides strong evidence that the sale was real and the receivable was valid at year-end. This simple procedure helps confirm both the occurrence of the transaction and the valuation of your accounts receivable, making it a go-to test for auditors looking for solid, external proof.
While not a direct test of revenue occurrence, reviewing the allowance for bad debt gives auditors insight into the quality of your receivables. This allowance is your company's estimate of how much of your accounts receivable you don't expect to collect. Auditors will scrutinize how you came up with this number, often comparing your current estimates to historical data. They do this to see if management might be trying to make profits look better by setting aside too little for bad debts. An unusually low estimate can be a red flag, suggesting an overstatement of net assets and income.
For businesses with subscriptions, licenses, or any model where customers pay upfront, the deferred revenue account is a major focus. This liability account holds cash received for services or goods you haven't delivered yet. Auditors examine this account to ensure you aren't recognizing revenue too early, before it's actually been earned. They will review contracts to understand your performance obligations and verify that you are following the five-step model for revenue recognition correctly. An automated system is crucial here, as it can apply complex rules consistently to ensure revenue is moved from deferred to earned in the proper period.
Even with the best intentions, proving revenue occurrence can be tricky. Auditors often run into a few common roadblocks that complicate the process. These challenges usually stem from the complexity of modern business models, the specifics of industry regulations, subjective timing decisions, and the technology used to track it all. Understanding these hurdles is the first step to preparing for a smoother audit.
Today’s business models are rarely simple. Many companies, especially in tech and SaaS, use hybrid revenue models that mix software subscriptions, one-time licenses, and bundled professional services. This creates a complicated web for auditors to untangle. As one of the most scrutinized areas in financial audits, revenue recognition becomes even riskier when you have fragmented data systems for each revenue stream. An auditor has to trace each component to ensure it’s accounted for correctly under ASC 606, which requires deep analysis and clear documentation to support your company’s judgment calls on performance obligations and transaction prices.
Revenue recognition isn't a one-size-fits-all concept. The rules can change significantly depending on your industry, affecting everything from your accounting processes to the very language in your customer contracts. For example, a construction company recognizing revenue over the life of a long-term project follows different guidelines than a software company selling annual subscriptions. Auditors need to be experts in these nuances, and they expect you to be, too. Misunderstanding or misapplying these industry-specific guidelines can lead to major compliance issues and restated financials, making this a critical area of focus during any audit.
One of the biggest gray areas in revenue recognition is timing. It’s not just about when you get paid; it’s about when you’ve actually earned the revenue by fulfilling your performance obligations. This often requires significant judgment, especially with multi-part deliverables or long-term contracts. For instance, how do you recognize revenue for a service delivered over several months? Misapplying the rules, even slightly, can distort your financial results and raise red flags. Auditors will look closely at your policies and the consistency of their application to ensure your timing aligns with ASC 606 principles and accurately reflects your company’s performance.
Your data lives in a lot of different places—your CRM, your ERP, your billing platform. When these systems don’t communicate, you create data silos that force your team into manual reconciliation, which is slow and prone to human error. For an auditor, this is a major headache. They have to trace transactions across disconnected systems, trying to piece together a complete picture. Automated systems solve this by ensuring timely and precise revenue recognition. By creating seamless integrations with HubiFi, you can sync data continuously, eliminate delays, and give auditors a clear, consolidated trail to follow.
For businesses with a high volume of sales, like e-commerce stores or SaaS companies, it’s simply not feasible for an auditor to check every single transaction. Instead, they rely on sampling to get a representative picture of your revenue. However, this introduces what’s known as sampling risk—the chance that the sample they select doesn’t accurately reflect the whole, potentially missing significant errors. This is a major concern for auditors, as their conclusions about your entire revenue stream are based on a small subset of data. To mitigate this risk, auditors need to trust that your processes are consistent across the board. An automated system ensures that every sale, no matter the size, is treated the same way, creating the kind of consistency that makes the audit sampling process much smoother and more reliable. A well-structured sampling method is essential for them to feel confident in their findings.
Customer relationships are dynamic. They upgrade, downgrade, add new services, or cancel—often in the middle of a billing cycle. Each of these events is a contract modification that impacts how you recognize revenue, and auditors pay very close attention to them. They need to see that you have a clear, consistent process for handling these changes and that your records are impeccable. Without a solid system, it’s easy for errors to slip in, leading to misstated revenue. Proper documentation and clear processes for managing contract modifications are essential to ensure compliance. Manually tracking these adjustments in spreadsheets is a recipe for trouble, as it’s prone to human error and creates a messy audit trail. An automated system can handle these complexities systematically, applying the correct accounting treatment under ASC 606 for every change.
While accounting is based on rules, it isn’t always black and white. Certain areas, like estimating your allowance for doubtful accounts, require management to make a judgment call. This subjectivity immediately puts auditors on high alert. They are trained to be skeptical of these estimates because, if not based on sound logic, they can be used to manipulate earnings. An auditor’s job is to ensure these judgments are reasonable and based on evidence, not wishful thinking. They will review how companies estimate bad debts by comparing current figures to historical data and industry benchmarks. If your estimate suddenly changes without a good reason, it raises a red flag. Having clean, accessible data on past collections and write-offs is your best defense, allowing you to build a data-driven case for your estimates that can stand up to auditor scrutiny.
Consistency is the cornerstone of reliable financial reporting. You can’t recognize revenue one way for one contract and a completely different way for a similar one. Auditors look for the consistent application of your accounting policies across all transactions, as it’s a key indicator of strong internal controls. Inconsistency, on the other hand, suggests that your processes may be weak, which will lead auditors to dig deeper and expand the scope of their testing. With complex standards like ASC 606, maintaining this consistency manually is a huge challenge. The consistent application of these standards is crucial for maintaining the integrity of your financial reporting. An automated revenue recognition platform removes this guesswork by serving as a single source of truth, applying your predefined accounting rules to every transaction without fail.
When an auditor examines your revenue, they aren't just asking one question. They're working through a checklist of what are known as management assertions—a set of claims your company implicitly makes about its financial information. Occurrence is a major one, but it’s closely related to others, particularly completeness and accuracy. Understanding how they differ is key to preparing for an audit because a transaction has to meet all the relevant criteria to be considered properly recorded. Think of them as different lenses an auditor uses to inspect the same transaction.
A single sale needs to be real (occurrence), recorded (completeness), and for the right amount (accuracy) to pass muster. Getting one right doesn't guarantee the others, which is why auditors look at them both individually and together to get a full picture of your financial health. It's a bit like a quality control check in a factory; a product isn't ready to ship just because it was assembled. It also needs to have all its parts and function correctly. Similarly, a transaction isn't properly accounted for just because it happened. It must also be fully and accurately documented in your financial statements. This distinction is crucial because different audit procedures are designed to test each specific assertion.
Occurrence and completeness are essentially two sides of the same coin. The occurrence assertion asks: "Did this recorded transaction actually happen?" It’s focused on preventing the overstatement of revenue by ensuring there are no fictitious sales in your books. For example, an auditor will test for occurrence to make sure a sale recorded on the last day of the quarter wasn't just made up to meet a target. Completeness, on the other hand, asks: "Have all the transactions that should have been recorded actually been included?" This assertion guards against the understatement of revenue by making sure no legitimate sales were left out. So, while occurrence is about validating what’s there, completeness is about finding what’s missing.
Even if a transaction actually happened (occurrence) and was recorded (completeness), it still needs to be accurate. The accuracy assertion checks whether the transaction was recorded for the correct amount and that all the details are right. For example, you might have a real sale for $500, but a data entry error records it as $5,000. The transaction passes the occurrence test, but it fails on accuracy. Auditors will review your company's internal controls and test transactions to confirm that the amounts and other data were captured correctly, as this is fundamental to the audit of assertions. This is where things like pricing, discounts, and currency conversions come under scrutiny to ensure the final number reflects the true value of the sale.
Knowing what auditors look for can help you stay prepared and maintain clean financial records. While every business is different, certain issues consistently raise questions during an audit. These red flags don't automatically mean something is wrong, but they do signal that an auditor will likely take a closer look. Being aware of these potential problem areas allows you to strengthen your internal processes and ensure your revenue reporting is solid, transparent, and ready for scrutiny. By understanding these common triggers, you can proactively address them before they become a major headache during an audit.
Auditors are trained to notice when something doesn't quite fit. This could be a sudden, large spike in sales right at the end of a reporting period, an unusually high number of credit memos issued after a quarter closes, or transactions with overly complex terms. For companies with hybrid revenue models that mix subscriptions and services, the risk is even higher. These complex scenarios often create fragmented data across different systems, making it difficult to present a clear picture. Keeping an eye on these patterns helps you spot and address potential issues before an auditor does, especially when dealing with disparate data from multiple integrations.
Your documentation tells the story of each transaction, and auditors expect that story to be consistent. A major red flag appears when supporting documents contradict each other. For example, if a customer contract outlines a 12-month service period but the invoice bills for the entire amount upfront, it creates confusion about when the revenue was actually earned. Auditors practice professional skepticism, meaning they are trained to question and verify. They will compare contracts, purchase orders, and invoices to ensure everything lines up. Consistent and thorough documentation is one of your best tools for a smooth audit process.
Timing is everything in revenue recognition. A common red flag is recognizing revenue prematurely—for instance, booking the full value of a contract before the service has been delivered. Another timing issue is recording revenue in the wrong period, such as pushing sales from the next quarter into the current one to meet targets. Auditors perform cut-off testing specifically to find these errors, ensuring transactions are recorded in the correct financial period. Proper timing is fundamental to ASC 606 compliance and is a core part of the five-step model for recognizing revenue from customer contracts.
Waiting for your annual external audit to find problems is like waiting for a hurricane to test the strength of your roof. A much better approach is to conduct your own checks throughout the year. This is where internal reviews, or internal audits, come in. They are proactive health checks for your business operations, designed to find and fix issues before they become major problems. Think of it as an ongoing process of self-improvement rather than a once-a-year final exam. By regularly examining your own processes, you can strengthen your internal controls, improve efficiency, and make the formal external audit a much smoother, less stressful experience.
These internal reviews aren't just about financials; they can cover everything from IT security to operational workflows. The goal is to provide your own leadership team with valuable insights to help them manage the business more effectively. It’s about building a culture of accountability and continuous improvement from the inside out. When your internal processes are solid, the external audit often becomes a straightforward validation of the good work you're already doing, rather than a frantic scramble to fix last-minute issues. This proactive stance is a hallmark of a well-managed, audit-ready organization.
The biggest difference between internal and external audits comes down to the audience and the purpose. An internal audit is performed for the company's own leaders and managers. Its primary goal is to help them improve the business by identifying weaknesses in processes and recommending solutions. It’s a tool for internal improvement. An external audit, on the other hand, is conducted for people outside the company, like investors, lenders, and regulators. Its purpose is to provide an independent opinion on whether the company's financial statements are accurate and compliant with accounting standards. It’s about providing external validation and trust.
Internal audits can wear many hats, focusing on different areas of the business depending on where the risks and opportunities lie. A financial audit looks at the accuracy of your accounting records, much like an external audit but with a focus on process improvement. A compliance audit checks whether the company is following laws and regulations. An operational audit examines the efficiency of your core business processes, while a technology or IT audit assesses your systems for security and effectiveness. Each type provides a different lens through which to view the health of your organization, helping you strengthen every facet of your operations.
When an internal audit uncovers an issue, the findings are often presented using a simple but powerful framework known as the "5 Cs." This structure helps turn a problem into an actionable solution. It starts with the Criteria (what the rule or standard should have been) and the Condition (what is actually happening). Then, it outlines the Consequence (how this problem affects the company) and the Cause (why the problem happened in the first place). Finally, and most importantly, it proposes a Corrective Action—a clear plan to fix the issue. This framework makes audit findings easy to understand and act upon.
After weeks or months of testing, reviewing documents, and analyzing data, the audit process culminates in one final, critical document: the audit report. This is the formal output of the entire engagement, and its most important component is the auditor's opinion. This opinion is the auditor's professional judgment on whether your financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with accounting principles. It’s the verdict that your investors, lenders, and board members have been waiting for, as it provides a crucial layer of assurance and credibility to your financial reporting.
The best possible outcome is an "unqualified" or "clean" opinion, which is essentially a green light from the auditors. It signals that your financial statements are free from material misstatements and can be relied upon. Other types of opinions, like a "qualified" or "adverse" opinion, indicate that the auditor found issues that need to be addressed. Achieving a clean audit opinion is a direct result of having strong internal controls, clean data, and transparent processes—all of which are easier to maintain with an automated system that keeps your financial records accurate and accessible year-round.
Passing an audit isn’t about luck; it’s about preparation. Strengthening your revenue occurrence controls is one of the most effective ways to ensure your financial statements are accurate and defensible. By putting the right systems in place, you not only make your auditor’s job easier but also build a more resilient and trustworthy business. Here are four key areas to focus on to tighten your controls and prepare for scrutiny.
Think of internal controls as the guardrails for your revenue process. Their purpose is to prevent and detect errors or misstatements before they become major issues. A core principle here is the segregation of duties—for example, ensuring the team member who creates an invoice isn't the same one who records the payment. Auditors use management assertions to identify potential risks in financial reports, and strong internal controls are your first line of defense. By clearly defining roles, requiring approvals for significant transactions, and securing your accounting systems, you create a framework that supports accurate and valid revenue reporting.
Don’t wait for year-end to discover a problem. Regular reconciliation is a critical habit for financial health. This means consistently matching the transactions in your accounting system to your bank statements, sales orders, and shipping logs. Performing these checks weekly or monthly helps you catch discrepancies—like a duplicate invoice or a payment recorded for the wrong amount—while the details are still fresh. This proactive approach turns a daunting annual task into a manageable routine. It ensures your records are consistently clean and ready for an audit of assertions at any time.
Your controls are only as effective as the people who execute them. Proper training ensures everyone on your sales and finance teams understands their role in the revenue recognition process and the importance of following procedures correctly. Document your policies clearly and hold regular training sessions to review them. When your team understands why a specific step is necessary—like verifying customer details before booking a sale—they are more likely to perform their duties accurately. This investment in education reduces human error and builds a culture of compliance from the ground up, helping you avoid the kinds of issues seen in major audit case studies.
For businesses with high transaction volumes, manual processes can quickly become overwhelmed, leading to errors that put revenue occurrence at risk. An automated revenue recognition solution removes the guesswork and inconsistency of manual data entry. These systems apply standardized rules to every transaction, ensuring revenue is recognized correctly and in the right period according to standards like ASC 606. By syncing data from your sales, billing, and payment platforms in real time, automation creates a single source of truth and a clear, unchangeable audit trail that validates every sale. It's the most reliable way to ensure accuracy and prepare your business to scale without compromising compliance.
Passing an audit isn’t a one-and-done event. It’s the result of consistent, thoughtful practices that keep your financial house in order all year long. Staying compliant means building a system that supports accuracy and transparency from the ground up. When you treat compliance as an ongoing discipline rather than a year-end scramble, you not only prepare for audits but also gain a clearer view of your business's financial health. These practices are about creating habits that make proving revenue occurrence second nature, ensuring you’re always ready to back up your numbers with confidence. This proactive stance transforms compliance from a stressful, periodic event into a continuous strategic advantage. It means your financial data is always reliable, empowering you to make smarter, faster decisions about growth, investment, and operations. By embedding these best practices into your daily workflow, you build a resilient financial foundation that satisfies auditors and supports sustainable growth. It's about shifting your mindset from "getting through the audit" to "maintaining audit-readiness" at all times. This not only reduces risk but also improves operational efficiency, as clean data and clear processes benefit the entire organization, not just the finance team.
Your first line of defense is a clear, documented revenue recognition policy. This isn't just corporate paperwork; it's your company's rulebook for how and when you record revenue. Revenue recognition is one of the most scrutinized areas in an audit, especially for businesses with hybrid models like software subscriptions mixed with professional services. Your policy should spell out exactly how you apply the five steps of ASC 606 to your specific offerings. It needs to define performance obligations, determine transaction prices, and allocate that price correctly. A strong policy removes ambiguity and ensures everyone on your team handles revenue the same way, every time.
Don't wait for auditors to find potential issues. Conducting your own periodic reviews helps you spot and fix problems before they grow. Think of these as internal mini-audits. Set aside time quarterly or semi-annually to sample transactions and trace them from the initial contract to the final journal entry. Look for inconsistencies between your policy and your practice. Are discounts being applied correctly? Are performance obligations being met before revenue is recognized? Learning from your own internal findings and published audit case studies helps you refine your processes and train your team more effectively.
An auditor’s job is to verify your numbers, and a detailed audit trail makes their job—and yours—infinitely easier. For every single transaction, you should be able to produce a clear, chronological record. This includes the original customer contract, purchase orders, invoices, shipping documents, and any related communications. It also means documenting any contract modifications or amendments. This trail is the evidence that proves a sale occurred and was recorded correctly. With the right data integrations, you can automatically link these documents within your systems, creating a seamless and easily accessible record for every dollar of revenue.
Manual data entry and siloed systems are breeding grounds for errors. When your CRM, billing platform, and accounting software don't talk to each other, you create delays and discrepancies that put you at risk. Automated systems that sync data in real time are essential for modern compliance. Automation ensures that when a contract is signed in your CRM, the revenue schedule is immediately and accurately calculated in your financial system according to ASC 606 rules. This eliminates human error, provides a single source of truth, and gives you an up-to-the-minute view of your financials. If you're ready to see how automation can transform your process, you can schedule a demo to explore a tailored solution.
What's the easiest way to think about revenue occurrence? Think of it as a fact-checker for your sales ledger. The occurrence assertion simply asks, "Did this sale you recorded actually happen with a real customer?" Before an auditor can worry about whether the amount is right or if you've recorded all your sales, they first need to confirm that the sales you've already listed aren't just phantom entries. It's the foundational question that proves your revenue numbers are based in reality.
What's the biggest mistake companies make with revenue occurrence? The most common pitfall is poor documentation and inconsistent timing. A company might have a valid contract but fail to keep clear records of when the service was actually delivered, leading them to recognize the revenue too early. This is especially risky at the end of a quarter or fiscal year when there's pressure to meet targets. Without a clear paper trail connecting a sale to its fulfillment, you leave auditors with no choice but to question the transaction's validity.
How is checking for 'occurrence' different from checking that all sales are 'complete'? They are two sides of the same coin, designed to catch different types of errors. Occurrence is about making sure the sales recorded in your books are real and not overstated. It asks, "Is this recorded sale legitimate?" Completeness is the opposite; it's about making sure all the legitimate sales you made actually got recorded and that your revenue isn't understated. It asks, "Are any real sales missing from the books?"
My business has a mix of subscriptions and one-time services. Does this make proving occurrence harder? Yes, it definitely adds a layer of complexity. When your sales data lives in different places—like a CRM for one-time services and a separate billing platform for subscriptions—it becomes much harder to present a unified, clear story to an auditor. They have to trace transactions across these disconnected systems, which increases the risk of errors and inconsistencies. This is where having all your data connected and synced becomes crucial for a smooth audit.
What's the single most important thing I can do to prepare for an audit of my revenue? Focus on maintaining a crystal-clear audit trail for every single sale. This means that for any given transaction in your ledger, you should be able to easily pull up the corresponding contract, customer purchase order, invoice, and proof of delivery. When this documentation is organized and consistent, you provide undeniable proof that the transaction occurred, which answers the auditor's primary question before they even have to dig deeper.
Former Root, EVP of Finance/Data at multiple FinTech startups
Jason Kyle Berwanger: An accomplished two-time entrepreneur, polyglot in finance, data & tech with 15 years of expertise. Builder, practitioner, leader—pioneering multiple ERP implementations and data solutions. Catalyst behind a 6% gross margin improvement with a sub-90-day IPO at Root insurance, powered by his vision & platform. Having held virtually every role from accountant to finance systems to finance exec, he brings a rare and noteworthy perspective in rethinking the finance tooling landscape.
Meet with an expert in revenue recognition and order-to-cash accounting and automate revenue close.
*Or watch 2 minute demo here.
Power your high-volume business's revenue compliance and reporting needs with one platform.
